So, knowing this going in, would it be kosher to ask about their practices during an interview? And if I ended up working there, is it unethical to assuage my guilt by using the economy and unemployment as an excuse? I'm not worried about the company being on my resume in the future -- I'm sure journalism recruiters understand that in times like this, people have to take what they have to do to be employed. What say you? I can always job hunt again if I'm unhappy there.
Some friends have recommended going for it anyway and if it turns out being what I think it is, just leapfrog elsewhere. But I promised myself that since I was miserable where I was, my next job would have to be a good one, and not to accept the first thing that came along. But who can afford that...COBRA's expensive! On the other hand, the bad economy could make the sales staff more ruthless and aggressive in terms of selling editorial. And if you tried to fight it, you'd be the first to go in layoffs. So. I still don't know! — On the Hunt for Magazine Employment
DEAR HUNT: This is a tricky one.
First, of course it is kosher to ask about their practices during the interview. Interviews have several functions. When we are on the job search, we often think only of what we can do to impress the employer. In fact, we also need to be doing significant research to see if this is a place where we could be comfortable and thrive, a place that would not only benefit from our talents, but help build them.
You need to know if you can do the job they ask. That’s a different issue from whether you should do the job. Can you see yourself doing this work? Do you see yourself meeting the company’s overall goals? If not, you might have to pragmatically turn it down, as you don’t see yourself succeeding there.
The hardest part of this situation, of course, is the risk to your ethics of needing to work. I worry that this economy can give unethical employers the license to take advantage of employees, asking them to do too much, to do work that is ethically iffy, to accept the normally unacceptable.
That’s why I start with a pragmatic answer. If this job requires you to be an advertising broker, you might simply not be able to do that.
The ethical answer, as usual, is more slippery. What happens if you think this could work, but it makes you uneasy? My answer there is that it will not work. I think you can stretch your morals only so far before they break and something important within you breaks along the way. The implications of this are that you not only hurt your moral standing in your own eyes, but you become a lesser employee for ethical publishers.
I am seriously uneasy about anybody ever taking a job just because they need the work. I see that as a failure waiting to happen. Yes, the opportunities right now might seem highly limited, but look for the long term. Will this job help you get where you want when the sun again shines on the economy (and it will), or will it hinder you from achieving your ultimate goals?
Look at this as a marriage. Would you jump at marrying that jerk you met in a bar just because you’re tired of being single? I seriously hope not. Nor would you stay in an abusive relationship. Working at Barnes and Noble and freelancing on the side is better than working full-time at a job that hurts you.
That said, your interview might demonstrate that all those things you read on the Internet are wrong (Imagine that happening!) and the place looks good. But ask the hard questions, don’t settle for glib answers, and talk to as many employees as possible. Ask about payment to writers. Sixteen cents a word is a huge red flag. Definitely check that one out.
Don’t play Mike Wallace—remain professional and polite, but remember your reportorial skills. Look at their products. Do you want your name on their masthead? Do you think they have promise and offer you an opportunity? These are the questions you ask no matter the economy.
2 comments:
The marriage analogy is a good one. I write articles on small businesses that are successful because of their great workplace practices and the leaders of these firms refer to this, too, from their perspective. It's not uncommon for many of them, espeically those with 100 or fewer employees, to schedule candidates to meet with as many as 7 or 8 employees in different areas of the business for both parties to get a solid feel for each other before an offer is made.
I would echo the suggestion to talk to a lot of employees -- especially if the company is not scheduling blocks of time between you and them. These days this is easier than ever to do via blogs and other profiles employees maintain on sites outside the company. The company employing them may have to worry about their access here, but you shouldn't.
If I were you, I would rely on my gut. If it smells wrong, it probably is. And if it's even just questionable, if it doesn't pan out, do you want to be back in this same place three or six months, or even a year or two, from now? It's better to take more time at this stage to identify a company you'd much rather associate yourself with to give yourself a better shot at a long and happy tenure.
Good luck!
Thanks for your perspective, Mark. You are right to suggest going with your gut. Always good advice.
Post a Comment