Drake's Magazines Win More Awards

New awards for the talented Drake students in the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication's Magazine contest:

Think magazine won first place for general excellence; first place, design; and second place, editorial excellence.  Emma Barker was editor-in-chief. 

Drake Magazine won second place for design (junior Annie Fuhrman designed both Think and Drake Mag); third place, editorial; and third place, service article (by Tara Richards et al). Tara Richards was editor in chief.

DrakeMag Online won 2nd place for online magazines. Matt McGuire was online editor. 

I've included judges comments on the design award below.  I selected these to highlight because I love it when Drake magazines win both first and second places.

Single Issue of an Ongoing Magazine—Design 

Judge: Bob Gray, design consultant for aarp.org and former design editor at National 

Geographic 

 

First Place 

Think  

Why It Won: Great use of strong imagery along with a solid design brings Think up from 

last year’s second place to the winner’s spot. The results show the design team was 

thinking on many levels to meet the challenge of creating a controlled underlying structure 

that allowed them to orchestrate weighty and sobering stories in a surprising and visually 

engaging way.  

Highlights: 

• Use of provocative imagery with typographic design in a supporting role. 

• Use of color-coding for organization of departments. Nicely sets them apart from 

the features.  

• Controlled typography. Good, readable text type, but needed a little more attention 

to widows and character/word spacing when using justified setting.  

• Effective use of the 7 5/8-inch x10-inch trim size especially with images.  

• Use of infographics, sidebars, timelines as additional entry points throughout the 

magazine. 

Second Place 

Drake  

Why It Won: Deft integration of engaging photography with creative typographic 

treatments kept me turning the pages. This magazine consistently makes the top three 

so I congratulate not only the students, but the program directors as well. The design is 

consistently well organized with good margin space, column widths and solid 

typesetting. The photography is well-played on the pages and the use of periodic design 

devices create a pleasing visual structure.  

Cover: Unfortunately the weakest component of this issue, though still following 

enough rules to stay solid. I wish the concept (which is good) had been further 

explored. 

Front and Back of the Book: Strong, yet underplayed graphics help readers know 

where they are throughout the magazine. The controlled design allows for breakouts on 

departments without sacrificing consistency. Again, the conceptual photography and 

design solutions on are excellent.  

Highlights: 

• Concept, photography, design, white space, and color choice of “In Transition” 

feature. Beautiful! 

• Contents page 

• Design and photography in Spare Change department